After three decades in UK construction, I'd had enough of working around software that was never built for how we actually work. So I decided to build something that was.
It's 6:15am. Coffee's going cold. You need one drawing revision from last week's tender package before the site meeting. It's definitely in a folder somewhere - the one Dave emailed, or maybe the shared drive. Twenty minutes later you've found it, but you've also opened fourteen other folders, two spreadsheets, and discovered a revision you didn't know existed.
Sound familiar?
After thirty years in UK construction, I'd had enough of working around software that was never built for how we actually work. So I decided to build something that was.
Our industry runs on workarounds. We've become experts at bending generic tools to do jobs they were never designed for. Spreadsheets tracking variations. Email threads as document registers. Standardised forms that took weeks to develop, modified by the next manager to suit their own preferences - undermining the very systems you're trying to build.
It works. Just about. But it's held together with determination and habit, not design.
The big construction platforms? They're either priced for Tier 1 contractors or built by people who've clearly never chased an RFI on a Friday afternoon.
This isn't a marketing line. It means every feature starts with a simple question: how does this actually work on site?
Take a drawing register. In construction, you don't just need a list of files. You need to know which revision supersedes which. You need it linked to the tender package it was issued with. You need to find it fast when the subbies are waiting and the QS is on the phone.
Upload fifty drawings and the system should recognise what they are - extract the title block, the revision, the discipline - and organise them automatically. Not make you type it all in while your coffee goes from cold to forgotten.
Construction lives and dies by cash flow. Payment applications should pull from contract sums without re-keying. Variations should trace back to original scope. The financial picture should be clear at any point - not buried in a spreadsheet that only one person understands.
When the QS asks where you are against budget, the answer shouldn't take half a day to compile.
AI is everywhere right now. Most of it's noise. But there are places where it genuinely saves time - and construction document management is one of them.
Upload a drawing and the system reads the title block automatically. Drawing number, title, revision, discipline - extracted and filed without you typing a thing.
Need to draft a letter to the architect about that delayed information? Describe what you need, and the system drafts it using your project data and proper construction language. Not generic waffle - correspondence that sounds like it came from someone who knows the contract.
Ask a question about your project in plain English. Get an answer based on your actual data, not a help article.
This isn't AI for the sake of it. It's AI that understands construction context and does the boring bits so you can focus on delivery.
I'm a Chartered Construction Manager. MCIOB qualified. Thirty years across fit-out, refurbishment, and commercial projects up to £180m. I've been a QS, a project manager, and everything in between.
Today I run Gemstone Contractors, a CIOB Chartered Building Company specialising in commercial fit-out and refurbishment. We're the first users of Construction AI - because I built it to solve problems we face every day.
This isn't a tech company guessing what construction needs. It's a contractor building the tools we've always wanted.
We're launching in beta soon. If you've spent too long fighting your software instead of building projects, I'd like to hear from you.